The Democrats are furious and just so angry that Bush "lied them into war" over WMD in Iraq. If only they can win some elections they will finally have the power to impeach him, they pray. Never mind that virtually all of the world's intelligence services concluded that Iraq had WMD and that common sense indicated to everyone else that he had them. And never mind that there were several reasons besides WMD to take out Saddam, not the least of which was that we had just failed to take out a far less threatening country (Afghanistan) and had suffered the worst surprise attack in our history on 9/11 as a result.
But let's say that Democrats are not cowards, and that they just don't think major foreign policy decisions should have been made on the basis of what they love to think of as, Bush's lies. Does this mean that if the truth had been that Saddam actually had WMD the Democrats would have given up their cowardly ways and been willing to go to war? Iran answers that question nicely. We know what the truth is about Iran and and we also know the Democrats have no intention of fighting them or anyone else, ever.
And then there is Darfur. Are the Democrats clamoring to get involved in that civil war just to stop a little genocide? Of course not. Bush didn't lie there, there is not even an opposing military to speak of. It is the first genocide of a new century; yet the sweet, caring and ever so principled Democrats are still dead silent, or should we say, dead cowardly, just as they were when their hasty retreat from Vietnam precipitated the massive genocide in Cambodia.
Yes, Bush has done little about Iran just as Ford did little about Cambodia, but this, one can logically assume, is because the Democrats have successfully give cowardliness a good name in America. Tragically, Bush's poll numbers demonstrate that the Democrat's expiatory moment is not coming soon.
comments: bje1000@aol.com
Ted Baiamonte
346
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I think that all of the representatives who were arrested for protesting outside the Sudan embassy were Democrats, trying to bring attention to the crisis. So is George Clooney, who you probably hate, but who is a decent man who is trying to use his position to influence foreign policy.
*****how silly, attention is not what's needed. Every human being on earth knows about Darfur. Are you really that blind??? Republican soldiers with guns and YF-22 fighter planes are needed. Democrats are too cowardly to fight even in Darfur and for now they rule because Iraq has gone so slowly.
your ridiculous rants are hilarious at times,
*****if true you'd provide an example
Except when i picture you as a real member of society who probably influences children
somewhere and is destroying their capability for rational thought and replacing it with your right-wing, lockstep, loyal ideology.
*******My views are the same as Thomas Jefferson's??? See why we say Democrats are anti American??
Here is a question:
*******excellent a lawyer wins a case by asking good questions. Not one democrats in 1000 knows that, but now you do
Have the Democrats ever been right about something that the Republicans were wrong
about?
*******it would be impossible since Republican Jeffersonians are for freedom from gov't while Democrats are for the exact opposite.
Some possibilities: Medicare, Medicaid,
******if socialism was good in medicine then it would be good in trains, planes, and automobiles and everything else, but all of world history proves this not to be so. How is it that you can't see the most obvious of things?
Fighting in WW2,
******see why we say Democrats are dumb? Both houses approved the declaration of war against Japan and Germany unanimously, except for Jeanette Rankin who I think was a socialist
creating the EPA,
*****if that was a good idea you forgot to explain why? Yes pollution, cold weather, failing schools but that does not mean a socialist bureaucracy is the solution, ask Stalin or Hitler and Castro, or France
having a 9/11 commission,
********???????
investigating the NSA.
*******??? we have courts that investigate everything all the time and always have??
Anything you can think of?
******like I said you must try to get your thinking organized. The issue of world history, the issue that created America is freedom versus Government. You've got yourself all confused by looking at little pieces that the media sells you every day to make money off you. Jefferson and American stand for freedom from gov't, not socialism. Is that so hard to follow?? Jefferson and Hamilton fought over freedom as do modern Republicans and Democrats. The NSA and EPA are not critical issues by themselves.
Because the problem then becomes that if you cannot admit this,
******True I cannot admit that freedom from gov't is bad. I know Jefferson and tradition American values too well
you will never be able to appreciate a good idea if it comes from the left,
*******That is true I only appreciate Jeffersonian American ideas that are designed to promote freedom from Government or Democrats. This is something a small child should be able to follow?? Please try hard and ask your friends to help you. If you want read
"Understanding The Difference Between Democrats and Republicans" After 200 pages you'll get your thoughts organized about the history of the world and current events.
and you will always struggle to reject bad ideas when they come from the right. A dangerous and useless pickle to be in, and luckily one that only 31% of Americans are in.
*******don't be silly Bush's rating over his execution of the war in Iraq hardly change the basic debate of world history that had been largely decided modern Democrats came along.
Post a Comment