Loveless Democratic Sex

It goes without saying that homosexuals are generally liberal Democrats. Gay rights is a relatively new phenomenon which of course means that liberals will exploit it by ignoring the conservative wisdom that got us this far through history, and embracing what is new, because, after all, it is new, and what is new is very very important, to liberals.

But gay sexual expression is not the only new form of sexual expression the Democrats love. In fact we live a magical new world of liberal sexual expression. Six men simulating anal sex on a float during the Gay Day Parade in NYC is just one example of liberalism helping us to accept and appreciate Democratic sex. Last week we learned of a man and his friend who jointly, in Vermont, raped a little girl for 4 years and was then sentenced to 60 days in jail. Sorry, there were no mitigating circumstances, just liberals everywhere. To show his liberalism, the Judge expressed and enacted his pro criminal sentiment that it was more important that the rapist be treated than imprisoned. This of course was not very comforting to conservative parents who believe in punishment for those who rape their children, and who know that sexual offenders are the least likely to be treated successfully anyway. The main stream liberal media was dead silent.

And then there was Dateline: a TV show whose investigation brought pedophiles out of the woodwork and into the home of a little girl where they were lured to have sex with her. A Rabbi, a teacher, and assorted others showed up. A few weeks later Dateline did the same thing in the same home and, despite the publicity the first show had received, still more pedophiles showed up, at least one of whom admitted to having seen the original show. Extrapolating nationwide one can assume that America the beautiful is now chock full of pedophiles. And of course normal heterosexuals have been liberated too. They divorce at a rate of about 50% only to have sex with other people during the course of far shorter second marriages; with nary a conservative scarlet letter to be seen. It is called no fault divorce because it is beyond their fault or ability to control, according to the liberals. If kids then grow up in poverty, so what? Divorce is deemed natural, like homosexuality and pedophilia. The liberals have no need to assign blame, they just accept and tolerate what is new without a wish or ability to judge, understand, or conserve wisdom from the past. Everything is morally relative. It's like Herbert Marcuse and John Lennon said , " Imagine there is no heaven; imagine there is no hell?" How dare Republicans analyze history in a way that asks them to repress or confine their sexuality in a manner consistent with civilization, the liberals wonder ?

And then there is Bill Clinton who, in perhaps the most important and memorable act of his presidency, taught our teens, and impressionable adults, that oral sex isn't sex, and certainly has nothing to do with love and family. Most teens seem to have accepted his Democratic wisdom too. I just heard the story, through a trusted friend, of an upper middle class family in Ohio who had a coed birthday party for their 13 year old daughter. It seems the parents left the room for a short time only to come back to find 10 boys lined up against a wall receiving oral sex from the girls. One has to wonder if the Clinton library features promiscuous loveless Democratic sex as one of the primary displays on the first floor near the main doors?

And then there is abortion, the cornerstone of the domestic Democratic agenda. It is their way, unconsciously, to destroy the concept of love and family altogether. They encourage us to have sex with people we don't love, and then kill the baby that may result, rather than fall in love, get married, and love children, the way people did in the so called intolerant and dreaded 1950s. They have succeeded to a point where more babies are now killed than loved, but somehow 1 million dead babies a year, just for sexual pleasure; at the expense of love, is not a bad trend to a Democrat.

One wonders where on earth these diabolical, overpowering, and perverse sexual appetites of ours come from? The truth seems to be that evolution's greatest fear was that we wouldn't reproduce enough to survive; so we were given a sex drive designed to overpower every other aspect of our being in order to assure that no matter what fate befell us: especially war, famine, disease, plague, and total exhaustion (the normal conditions during the period in which we evolved) we would still see to our primary evolutionary directive: reproduction. If it was any other way, none of us would be here. Today, progress has eliminated many of the factors that, historicially, distracted us from sex. Sex, then, has emerged as a more powerful preoccupation than at any time in human history, and accordingly must be repressed and constrained more than ever in a manner consistent with civilized values.

The result of our huge sex drive was hugely chaotic sexual practices that could be measured in millions of dead bodies until the saintly "religious right" stepped in to invent and promote a concept of love and family in which sexuality was finally given a context consistent with civilization. Under the religious right, love, family and civilization blossomed in 1000 years, 10 times more than it had in all of human history.

But today the chaotic liberals are back, and opposed to the incredible progress the religious right bestowed upon mankind. And again their failure can be measured in millions of dead bodies. 50 million Africans and 3 million Americans are scheduled to die in the next 30 years because they had sex in a liberal context. About 80% of the American children who grow up in poverty would not be poor if their parents had chosen the religious right's version of sexuality. And then of course there are 3000 kids who die everyday in Africa, each one of whom would have preferred two loving, faithful parents. and not to be treated as mere artifacts of passion in the name of liberal tolerance. Then there is the mainstream liberal ACLU which is now defending NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association), in the name of liberal civil liberties, in a Massachusetts case while concomitantly attacking the religious right? Dead, amoral parents, and starving, sick, abused children seem to be the liberal legacy; yet the enlightened, sophisticated, educated, and oh so sensitive liberals, regard the religious right as the very antithesis of civilization?

So what should we do about Gays, divorcees, pedophiles, abortionists, and free love advocates who are slowly rotting our culture ? We should do what the saintly religious right has always done, i.e., encourage them to do the very best they can at love and family, and in the extreme cases put them in jail. Indeed, the ultimate question of civilization is: do we want to harness humankind's greatest and most powerful instinct and tie it inextricably to love, family, and children, or do we want to destroy the very concept of love by acting out some loveless liberal pornographic vision of human sexuality?


Ted Baiamonte
comments:bje1000@aol.com f