Simple:
The United States is being and has always been stupid about the Middle East. For 50 years we have offered blind support to Israel that they have used mostly to steal Palestinian land rather than to live defensively within, miraculously given, internationally recognized borders. While the hour is late and the situation has been aggravated to the point of suicidal hysteria it is never too late to do the right thing and possibly create peace as follows:
1) Tell Israel that not one more penny will be forthcoming unless they build a defensive wall at the internationally recognized 1967 borders, and live peacefully behind that wall except to counter attacks over the wall. When living behind legitimate borders Israel will have the legitimate right to attack those who attack them, and in so doing will also help us by weakening the Islamo-Fascist militias (Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Muslim Brotherhood) that threaten us directly and the oil producing status quo in the Middle East.
2) Demand the rest of the world finally take a position to either support and defend the 1967 boundaries, push Israel into the sea, or shut up and be cowardly, impotent bystanders forever. Once the United States has finally taken a clear, simple, practical, and moral position the entire world will no longer be so confused, befuddled and frightened by the Israeli trick of presenting the Middle East to us as a very technical, complicated region of the world in which only they can navigate. Murderous fools hating and killing each other is neither technical nor complex.
Many countries led by the US will defend the UN sanctioned 1967 borders. All the preposterous rhetoric, arguments, speeches and garbage coming out of the mouths of the combatants will be instantly irrelevant and superfluous. We won’t have to hear about water rights, Shabaa Farms, right of return, judifying Jerusalem, who got there first, who attacked first, or what holy book fanatics think, anymore. The Israelis will have no arguments and the Muslims will have one remaining argument that will sound silly even to them: Allah demands that we drive the Jews into the sea.
Of course if this had all happened 40 years ago the Muslims would have had time to forget about their neighbors on the other side of the internationally created, defended, and justified wall, and go on with their lives with or without massive international aid. Sadly, 40 years of American stupidity and Israeli aggression has caused a metastatic hatred across much of the world, and worse, Muslims now have long range rockets that they can fire over the wall and, one day soon, over the oceans. Nevertheless, clear, simple, honest, and moral language and a clear, simple, honest, and moral way to think about the problem is the best place to begin, even if it’s late in the game. The US must become an honest peace broker rather than remain as a blind, dumb supporter of Israel. An honest broker can be an effective advocate for peace while a partisan broker is someone in whom Muslims will have an ever growing hatred. And, “ever” can be a long deadly time when you’re talking about a suicidally fanatic people with trillions of petrodollars with which to develop WMD and delivery systems.
More blind support for Israel as it destroys the entire nation of Lebanon, with American weapons, seems like nothing more than an exact continuation of the same policy that has failed so horribly for 50 years. This seems especially true when you consider that Shiite Hizbullah is what emerged from Lebanon the last time Israel destroyed it. And even more true, if that’s possible, given that this time the US has opened up its own front against the Shiites in Iraq thus making Western and US imperialism more obvious to the entire world, and to the pan-Arabic world in particular which has always hated and feared US imperialism but which may not have been absolutely convinced of it even by Osama Bin Laden’s attack on 9/11.
In Bush’s neo-con zeal to chart a new course from Clinton’s very engaged course he immediately pronounced, upon taking office, that there would be no peace between Israel and Palestine until they were ready to make peace. That “who gives a damn” attitude toward a horrid, suppurative war, the continued blind support for Israel, the preplanned and executed attack on Iraq, the attack on Afghanistan, the current blind support for Israel as it destroys Lebanon, and the galvanizing effect on both sides of 9/11, have all virtually insured that only a military solution to our differences with the Muslims is possible. If Bush had supported a wall at the 1967 borders with Clinton’s persistent sensitivity and had not attacked Iraq, things might have been very different, but no one can be sure. When Arafat walked away from Clinton’s very generous peace plan the Bushies may have correctly concluded that war, and the democracies that might have come from it, was the only possible course of action.
In any case, we’ve got multiple wars now (Iraq, Lebanon, & Afghanistan) that must be resolved. In Lebanon, we must encourage the world to support and defend the ‘67 borders to marginalize both Israel and the Hizbullah, and to insure that fanatic independent militias such as Al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hizbullah don’t conquer the region before we achieve energy independence. We can stay the course in Afghanistan as long as it’s an international effort; if not we can leave after a year unless 70% of the population agrees to take up arms and support freedom. We can always go back in to destroy a Taliban gov’t if it becomes big enough to be visible or aggressive. And, in Iraq we must withdraw to the safety of friendly and stable Kurdistan until the civil war is over, and then try to unite or, if not, partition, the country.
In sum, our mistakes have been many: 1) blind support for Israeli aggression, 2) total somnambulance after the first attack on the World Trade Center and 3) attacking Iraq. Now we face another mistake in Lebanon. We can continue to support what Israel has done, namely, go for the military victory that has eluded them for 50 years despite overwhelming military superiority, and spawned a worldwide jihad that seemingly can never be defeated, or we can support a comprehensive peace plan at the 1967 borders.
Ted Baiamonte
comments welcome: bje1000@aol.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

3 comments:
So tell me, when did the war in Irag become a bad idea? Two years ago, it was necissary. Sadam was the big problem, wasn't he?
But wait, hold on, it was Israel the whole time? Your 'break a few egss' philosophy regarding the treatment of Iragi POW, your ideas of Iraq being the clear and present danger in the Middle East, is that all over now? Were you wrong then, or are you wrong now? Maybe you just didn't have enough information to inform your hard-line, blanket statements.
Can you even believe yourself?
So tell me, when did the war in Iraq become a bad idea?
*****from my point of view it was always a bad idea
Two years ago, it was necessary. Sadam was the big problem, wasn't he?
*******Yes a Nazi like dictator who hates us and is shooting at our planes daily is a problem
But wait, hold on, it was Israel the whole time?
******yes it is true that our blind support of Israel is the heart of the problem
Your 'break a few egss' philosophy
******what???
Regarding the treatment of Iraqi POW, your ideas of
Iraq being the clear and present danger in the Middle East, is that all over now?
*******it is not over?? I did not say it was over??
Were you wrong then, or are you wrong now?
******why would you think I was wrong??
Maybe you just didn't have enough
information to inform your hard-line, blanket statements.
*****no idea why do you think that??
Can you even believe yourself?
*******of course but why do you ask??
It's somewhat contradictory to awknowledge that someone like Sadam is a problem and then say that war is a bad idea.
Let's just cut through all the political arguments and get to the point. Sadam was evil. He was known to gas his own people simply because of their beliefs or standpoints. Iraqis were tortured and slaughtered under his reign with his FULL knowledge of the things being done. Children on soccer teams worried about losing their soccer games because it meant that their parents might be killed. He harbored terrorists and associated groups in his own country KNOWING what they were capable of and what they already had been doing. And regardless of what "proof" the world thinks it needs, there is no question or hesitation in my mind that he was creating weapons of mass destruction. Common sense tells you that a freak like Saddam is going to look for a way to gain more power as a dictator and weapons of mass destruction was the next logical step. It would not only have been stupid for America to continue to ignore that threat, but also irresponsible. EVEN IF Saddam was not making any weapons and even if he never came after anyone else (which we all know is a fat chance), the crimes against his own people were unspeakable and I don't understand how people can criticize the war so easily.
All the instability that is being caused in Iraq now is being caused by all these terrorist groups and extreme factions that Saddam ALLOWED into the country and are now fighting to keep their control. Everyone complains because of the "catastrophie" that the Iraq war is, but if they would pull their ignorant heads out of their arrogant butts, they would clearly see that the situation is as bad as it is now because of numerous years of neglect from the rest of the world (America included). The middle east did not get into the situation it's in now overnight. It got that way because the world saw dictators and terrorists rise to power and they did nothing about it. You think it's a catastrophy now? Let America pull out and create a power vacuum that will likely be filled by another extremist group, and you watch the nation plummet. And then, when one group has finally gained power, they will bring their merciless little explosives over to America and have all sorts of fun with OUR citizens.
Although I understand your statements regarding Israel, I don't agree with a lot of them. Granted, they have been aggresive, but usually anytime there was a cease fire it was the Palestinians or one of their affiliated groups that broke it. Israel would retaliate and everything would just start over. Those nations HATE Israel, and I don't care how many maps, charts, diagrams, paint-by-numbers, or crayon drawings you create to show their boundaries, they will continue to attack Israel because they want Israel dead. Those nations won't directly come out and say it, but you clearly see their stance based on the fact that they harbor terrorist groups that carry out the strikes.
Really, though, I think we're all forgetting a very important point. Our whole reason for even going to the middle east in the first place was to fight terrorism. 9/11 opened our eyes to a very important fact... ignoring terrorism does not make us immune to it. If anything, it makes us MORE susceptable to it because it means we're too stupid to recognize a threat and deal with it. When we first went to Afganistan, Bush told us it was not going to be an easy war. Terrorists are an enemy that hide in dark corners and attack in ruthless ways. Bush told us it was going to take time. Everyone says he lied to us, but he didn't. He told us he was going to go after nations that harbored terrorists. Iraq clearly harbored them and according to his first statement he planned on going after any nation that did this. The fact people need "Physical proof" of the existence of WOMD is preposterous. Not finding evidence doesn't mean Hussein didn't have them and it doesn't mean he wasn't researching them, because anyone with half a brain can look at his rule and his personality and know that he was up to something. All it means is that he is good at hiding and destroying evidence.
Honestly, I think people just need to shut up and give Bush a little trust and a little credit. He gets reports that we don't, he knows things that would be dangerous for the public to know (because it means the terroristts would also know), and unlike the last atrocity we called a president, he actually has integrity and has stood firm with everything he has said. He has seen us through more tragedies than most other presidents and he has brought our economy to an all time high and unemployment to an all time low. (And anyone who says differently needs to do some research and quit believing lies.) I, being an american, find it ironic that a nation with most of its population being fat, in debt, and incapable of managing their own families, lives, jobs, and finances seems to think it can easily do a better job with our country and the middle east with a quarter of the information than the president has.
In conlusion... America.. shut up.
Post a Comment