5.31.2005

GAMBLING WITH 10 MILLION LIVES

Here are some key facts:
1) The 9/11 commission has stated the al Qaeda considers it a solemn obligation to launch a nuclear attack against the United States.

2) The CIA has stated that it cannot account for missing nuclear material and that such material might already be in the hands of al-Queda.

3) The Mexican border is virtually wide open as an area through which such an attack might be launched. Some areas, such as Organ Pipe National Park, can, if fact, be driven through.

4) According to Adm. Loy, "al Qaeda plans to use Mexico's professional people smugglers, also known as coyotes, to infiltrate terrorists across our southern border. Adm. Loy's information is based on recent interrogations and has been confirmed by ongoing counter terrorist operations. This underground pipeline originates in countries as far away as China, Brazil and Nigeria, where professional smugglers charge thousands of dollars to transport aliens to the United States. Many of these smuggling networks converge in Mexico, where coyotes intimately familiar with the gaps in our security take over the task of transporting aliens beyond the border into our cities. Aliens who prefer can travel to Mexico's border towns and hire their own coyotes as guides for the final passage. To assist them, the Mexican Foreign Ministry has prepared a handbook for illegal aliens."

5) "Salim Boughader Mucharrafille was also ordered by U.S. District Judge Thomas Whelan to spend three years under supervised release and was fined $5,000. Boughader pleaded guilty in March to running a ring that helped more than 100 immigrants cross the border into San Diego. Most of the immigrants were Lebanese."

6) One or two helicopter gun ships could seal the border instantly until a serious fence, moat, or land mines could be placed along the entire border. Incidentally, the loss of Mexican life would then probably be less than the loss currently incurred by Mexicans and others in attempts to get across the border.

7) "The polarizing debate over Proposition 187 (wherein Republicans favored modest immigration "reform") in California has been blamed for sinking the Republican Party in California, and possibly the entire country in the longer term, and allowing Democrats to dominate Sacramento."

8) The Democrats have concluded that the votes they get from an open nuclear border are more important than a potential nuclear attack on the United States.

9) Half of all the world's immigrants come to America, the country liberals love to hate. Ideally, rather than allowing this crime, America should dutifully pacify the world by turning them back with copies of our Constitution. It is not possible though because Democrats hate America and refuse to promote its Republican values around the world.

10) The economics of the situation are not important. Mexicans work cheap, enhance our competitiveness, and lower prices, but they are a net drain on social services, and they lower wages or unemploy poor Americans which is a further drain on social services.

Conclusion:

The Democrats subsist based on a subversive anti-American calculus wherein they buy votes from their various special interest groups by promising them money (mostly taxed from their other special interest groups) and/or programs. In this case, to close the sale, Democrats are gambling with the life of a major American City (assuming al-Qaeda attacks only one city.) If the deal doesn't pay off, i.e., if an American city is successfully attacked, the Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now.

Ted Baiamonte
comments:bje1000@aol.com

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

but ted, if you seal the frontier, the mexicains would not be able to work for the american companies for their competitive price! you would be interrupting the sacred flow of the free trade of goods and services! Isn't this bad?

and by the way, if america is a free land, how do you explain banishing half of its population on the only basis of their political opinions?

Ted said...

Ted, if you seal the frontier, the Mexicans would not be able to work for the American companies
*******if they were processed and let in legally they would
for their competitive price! You would be interrupting the sacred flow of the free trade of goods and services! Isn't this bad?
*********don't be that stupid a capitalist economic system does not require no political or geographic borders and it allows you to give you children food too. Get it now???

And by the way, if America is a free land, how do you explain banishing half of its population on the only basis of their political opinions?
*********banish??????

Anonymous said...

*******if they were processed and let in legally they would
such processing would take an hour or so, every day, in and out. Not very practical

*********don't be that stupid a capitalist economic system does not require no political or geographic borders and it allows you to give you children food too. Get it now???

well, free trade between nations does require the borders to be ope, in my opinion.

Anonymous said...

*********banish??????

"Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine

Anonymous said...

*********banish??????

"Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine

Anonymous said...

*********banish??????

"Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine

Anonymous said...

*********banish??????

"Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine

Anonymous said...

*********banish??????

"Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine

Anonymous said...

*********banish??????

"Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine

Anonymous said...

*********banish??????

"Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine

Anonymous said...

*********banish??????
"the Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine

Ted said...

french student said... *******if they were processed and let in legally they would
such processing would take an hour or so, every day, in and out. Not very practical
********practiciality was not our subject

*********don't be that stupid a capitalist economic system does not require no political or geographic borders, and it allows you to give your children food too. Get it now???

well, free trade between nations does require the borders to be open, in my opinion.
******not open to the point where the borders have no purpose- then there are no nations- get it now??

french student said... *********banish??????

"Democrats should accede to a Constitutional Amendment banning them forever from American soil. Better yet, just for having the infinite and brain-dead audacity to make such a gamble in the first place they should accede to such an Amendment right now."

your words, not mine
*******did I say they were your words??? are you drunk????

Anonymous said...

"not very practical" was an euphemism for "impraticable to the point where it becomes impossible"
another of the differennce between the capitalist model and reality: goods, people, services and information do not travel instantaneously.

As for the openness of the borders, in the capitalist theory, nations are not adressed. There are no limits on the free circulation of googds and services.

As for the "bannish "comment, you seemed to be surprised I used this term, I merely showed you where I had taken it. From your own post.

Ted said...

french student said... "not very practical" was a euphemism for "impracticable to the point where it becomes impossible"
******** don't know what "it" is so don't know what you are talking about??

Another of the difference between the capitalist model and reality: goods, people, services and information do not travel instantaneously.
*******did anyone say they did???

As for the openness of the borders, in the capitalist theory, nations are not addressed
******like I said, there are 1000s of versions of capitalism. God did not provide one version-get it now???

There are no limits on the free circulation of goods and services.
*****did someone say there was??

As for the "banish "comment, you seemed to be surprised I used this term, I merely showed you where I had taken it. From your own post.
*******who cares???

8:26 PM